Saturday, November 10, 2007

Another fun day at the NBT

D had to miss rehearsal last week because she had an audition in LA (unfortunately, she didn't get the part). So this week, instead of catching her up to speed, the "beotch" in charge of the party scene made her sit out the whole damned rehearsal and watch. This woman (RH-N) is the same one who was teaching D's class last year and managed to be absent for so long that the girls missed out on starting pointe when they were supposed to. She also left them less than prepared for the transition to the crazy plans VS-K has in mind for the NBT. But it is supposedly all D's fault because she isn't "prepared". In the meantime, how in Hades is D supposed to learn if she is sitting in a corner and not allowed to participate? Doesn't that sound like they are TRYING to keep her from learning so they could put her out? How stupid is that?

I complained to the principal and her reaction was that little 10 and 11 y/o girls are responsible for learning their own choreography. Basically I was told that if D doesn't get another 11 y/o to teach her what she missed, she cannot be in the production. BULLSHIT!!!!

I am sorry, but we are talking about children here. They are not going to the Kirov School and to assume they are is really stupid.

The woman is there because she and her husband are best friends with the Artistic Direct on the professional company side. There was NO "international search" or even an attempt to advertise (and I looked, believe you me). BS just waited till VS-K's contract was over at her previous position. Then he sprang her on everyone like she was the result of painstaking screening and all that jazz.

I don't think they want the lawsuit I am about to spring on them if D is not allowed to dance. It has nothing to do with her not knowing the choreography (she does), but because RH-N doesn't like D and has decided to use this occasion to hurt her. Isn't it nice that they waited till they got a shitload of money out of me to "discover" AFTERWARDS that D shouldn't have been in their first-year Youth Company?

You know, I may call and request an appointment with Nancy. It's her baby-let her hear how it is being abused in the name of "art".

Oh, and on the stuck-up Japanese front--D told me this afternoon that one of the girls in her class was talking to her when H walked by and shot the girl a dirty look. The girl said "Sorry, H" and left D to go join her. H did the same thing the other day in front of me when A.T. was chatting with D. In fact, she pulled A. away and whispered loud enough for me to hear that she wasn't supposed to talk to D if she wanted to stay friends. AND I have on film where H and her little friend R are playing around during class when D is not. So much for the "H is a good girl. She doesn't play around in class. She concentrates every minute." Poor little victim Y-mommy is still playing that "D is evil and H is perfect" crapola. Sheesh! I wonder if I should post the video for Y to see and make sure that H loses her alleged private lessons with Ms. E.

You would think with the alimony and child support she is allegedly sucking out of her poor ex, she would buy a clue. But then I hear the money is not as good as she claims... If it were, Y would have sped out to buy both her girls a video Nano because D has a regular Nano. That is how she is. Interesting to note that H is wearing some of mummy's clothing and that little sister is now wearing Target instead of Nordstrom and Macy's. The place is better than Wisteria Lane when you want to get the dirt on some of those sad women there. I think the women who actually work and have lives are better off and more stable, that's for sure.

1 comment:

Bronzemom said...

What is going on out there?
What's this other stuff Mike was telling me about?
CALL.